Offshore Development Team Models
- Increase your adaptability
- Assist you with staffing services
- Prepare for peak loads by scaling your development
- Improve company's core focus
- Reduce and manage your running expenses
100% Confidential & Secure.

Offshore development team model #1
Fixed Price Model
For short-term projects, fixed-price outsourcing is preferable. It has a defined scope and project needs, as well as a fixed delivery schedule and budget. The offshore development teams can give a program and an anticipated price based on the project scope and complexity when the customer specifies a time frame.
- Advantages
- Suitable for small and mid-sized projects with well-defined needs and outputs from the outset.
- Before the commencement of the project, the cost and timeline are carefully established.
- Because the service providers manage end-to-end development and deliverables, the customer requires very minimal monitoring.
- There’s a slight chance of losing money because the payment terms are well established.
- Disadvantages
- Planning and documenting each stage or necessity is a lengthy procedure.
- Focus on completing the agreed-upon scope of work, not on producing a superior result.
- There’s a good chance you’ll have a product that doesn’t fit the market.
- It isn’t easy to make adjustments to a project once it’s started, both during and after it’s completed.
- In terms of handling extra features and modification requests, there is less flexibility.
- Client control is limited because the firm handles the whole development process.
Offshore development team model #2
Time, Material & Resource
It gives them complete control over the project and allows them to amend or alter the project specs at any moment, reducing both cost and time spent on the project
- Advantages
- This paradigm works well for massive, long-term projects with unexpected outcomes.
- Clients and service providers both benefit from this low-risk paradigm.
- The budget is usually variable.
- The client has considerable influence over the project and any on-demand improvements made during the project.
- Reduced likelihood of failure.
- Disadvantages
- Project completion dates might be flexible or indeterminate.
- The estimated budget may differ from the final budget because of unforeseen changes that may affect the overall development cost.
- The client has the power to make modifications or to oversee the entire development process.
- Deadlines that aren’t known. Any project feature additions might have a direct influence on the product’s time to market.
- The budget isn’t specified. Because of the unpredictability of the time necessary to develop and deploy features, the project price under this approach is always provisional.
- Product owners are often responsible for all iterations as well as the development process.
Offshore development team model #3
Shared Resource Model
A shared services model consolidates, standardises, and automates operations in low-cost areas to provide services to internal customers. Internal customers are anyone who might benefit from a greater emphasis on value-added activities. The goal of a shared service model is to help a company run, expand, or transform.
- Advantages
- This paradigm works well for massive, long-term projects with unexpected outcomes.
- Clients and service providers both benefit from this low-risk paradigm.
- The budget is usually variable.
- The client has considerable influence over the project and any on-demand improvements made during the project.
- Reduced likelihood of failure.
- Disadvantages
- Project completion dates might be flexible or indeterminate.
- The estimated budget may differ from the final budget because of unforeseen changes that may affect the overall development cost.
- The client has the power to make modifications or to oversee the entire development process.
- Deadlines that aren’t known. Any project feature additions might have a direct influence on the product’s time to market.
- The budget isn’t specified. Because of the unpredictability of the time necessary to develop and deploy features, the project price under this approach is always provisional.
- Product owners are often responsible for all iterations as well as the development process.
offshore development model #4
Dedicated Developers and Teams
A shared services model consolidates, standardises, and automates operations in low-cost areas to provide services to internal customers. Internal customers are anyone who might benefit from a greater emphasis on value-added activities. The goal of a shared service model is to help a company run, expand, or transform.
- Dedicated Developers
- Service-based enterprises commonly use dedicated developers offshore software development with non-technical core competencies.
- With local engineers costing over €50 an hour, offshore is a cost-effective alternative that allows them to recruit full-time developers for a fraction of the price.
- Businesses may already have an in-house development team in certain circumstances, but they cannot expand up and take on larger projects.
- A specialised offshore staff may be the best option because fresh developers are expensive and difficult to come by.
- Although we have engineers and developers for a one-time job, working with an outsourcing provider can be a better option.
- Dedicated Teams
- After you’ve laid the groundwork, the next stage is to start assembling your offshore team with Reman’s reputable offshore development firm.
- First, share your company’s vision and mission.
- Explaining your company’s image and goal to our offshore workforce is the first step toward successful cooperation.
- Establishing a relationship with your remote workforce, on the other hand, is critical.
- You should always have a clear vision and objective for your project from the moment you assemble your offshore team.
100% Secure & Confidential
Benefits of building your team with us.
We know that building a startup is tough. And we have been there. It’s hard to find the right people to do the job. We make it simple. We have all the services you need under one roof.
- Cost-effectiveness
Hiring offshore teams is often 2-3 times less expensive than keeping an in-house department.
- Flexibility
Owing to the on-demand business model, you may change the number of people working on a project at any moment.
- Focused Environment
Maintain a laser-like focus on the company’s core tasks and delegate staff and document management to the vendor.
- Shared accountability
Reduces the company’s risk exposure and provides a failsafe for project managers if things don’t go as planned.
- Diversity
Provides businesses with access to various working styles, views, and points of view from a global resource pool.
- Free 14 Day Trial
Start your project with us for free. If you are not satisfied with our teams, we refund all your payment in full.
45 Minutes of free consultation
+ business analysis + wireframe design